SMT. POONAM AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NA528/596/2025 · 2025-06-13
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146439 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146439 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35530 Court No. - 11 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 596 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Poonam And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Neeraj Kumar Baghel,Praveen Yadav,Shiv Sagar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Shri Amrendra Kumar and Shri Prashant Singh, Advocates filed Joint Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. The instant application has been filed for quashing the charge-sheet dated 12.02.2025 filed in Case Crime No.0551/2024, under Sections 333, 352, 351(2), 131, 324(4) BNS, Police Station Biswan, District Sitapur as well as summoning order dated 16.05.2025 passed by Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Court No.2/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitapur in the aforesaid case.
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application.
5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.
6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.
7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.
8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 13.6.2025 V. Sinha Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench