Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 146425 (ALL)

SUNITA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/5903/2025 · 2025-06-23

Alok Mathur, Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36039-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5903 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sunita Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Srivastava,Ashok Tiwari,Manoj Kumar,Urvashi Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sharad Tewari Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Dinesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing counsel for respondent No.s 1, 2, 3 and 4 and Sri Shiv Prakash Kushwaha for respondent No.5. 2. It has been submitted that the petitioner is owner in possession of the land of gata No.1257 area 0.7590 hectare situated in Village Thulrai, Pargana and Tehsil Dalmau, District Raebareli. It has also been submitted that on behalf of respondent No.5 the said land was sought to be acquired by means of a registered sale deed dated 16.4.2021 and an area of 0.3795 hectare was transferred in favour of respondent No.5. 3. The allegations leveled in the present writ petition is that respondent No.5 has, in fact, acquired/encroached upon the an area of 0.3795 hectare out of the holding of the petitioner and have not paid compensation /sale consideration for the excess land area of 0.2680 hectare acquired by them. 4. After arguing the matter at some length learned counsel for the petitioner submits he has given a detailed representation in this regard to respondent No. 2 on 17.5.2025 and the grievance of the petitioner shall stand substantially redressed in case opposite party No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the said representation expeditiously,. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents does not object to the innocuous prayer of the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to opposite party No.2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 17.5.2025, as contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition, expeditiously, say within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioner. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, J.) (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 23.6.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench