Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1464 (PAT)

Md. Imran v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./69363/2025 · 2026-04-01

Anil Kumar Sinha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69363 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-123 Year-2024 Thana- NAUGACHIA District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Md. Imran son of Md. Javed Resident Of Village- Simra Purab Tola, Ps -Nau- gachia, Dist -Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Hojra Begum @ Hajra Begum Wife of Md. Imran Resident Of Village- Simra ward no. 6, Ps -Naugachia, Dist -Bhagalpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Pathak For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 4 01-04-2026 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Naugachia P.S. Case No. 123 / 2024 dated 11.04.2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 379 and 34 of the I.P.C. 3. As per the prosecution case the marriage of the informant was solemnized with the petitioner 23.07.2015 as per Muslim rites and rituals and out of the wedlock the informant was blessed with one female child. It is alleged that the petitioner at the instance of his family members started demanding dowry and on 13.03.2024 attempted to kill her but anyhow she saved her life and fled away from her matrimonial home. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69363 of 2025(4) dt.01-04-2026 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case inasmuch as he has not committed any offence in the manner alleged. He further submits that from perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that allegation made against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. He next submits that informant is an arrogant lady and did not co-operate in daily chores of domestic work and used to very oftenly visit her ‘maika’ without consent of the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel next submits that the matter was sent for mediation by this Court vide order dated 17.01.2026 and final mediation report is on record (flag- ‘M’). From perusal of the same it appears that both husband and wife arrived at amicable settlement and have jointly signed the agreement containing terms and conditions of compromise on 25.03.2026. 6. Learned counsel for O.P. No. 2 supports the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner regarding amicable settlement arrived at between the parties through the process of mediation. 7. Considering the fact that the matter has been compromised and both husband and wife has arrived at amicable settlement before the learned Mediator and mediation report has been submitted by the Mediator having the terms and conditions of compromise, I am inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69363 of 2025(4) dt.01-04-2026 3/3 anticipatory bail subject to the condition that the parties shall abide by the terms and conditions entered into between them before the learned Mediator mentioned in the mediation report dated 25.03.2026. 8. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest / surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Naugachia in connection with Naugachia P.S. Case No. 123 / 2024 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 2023. praful/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U T