Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 146380 (ALL)

SANTOSH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/662/2025 · 2025-07-09

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39138 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 662 of 2025 Applicant :- Santosh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Kumar Tiwari,Sanjay Kumar Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Suresh Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. 2. Sri Sanjay Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant has stated that during pendency of this anticipatory bail application, the accused-applicant has been arrested, therefore, this application has been rendered infructuous. 3. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed being infructuous. 4. Consigned to record. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 9.7.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench