Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010133962017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4061/2017 MANOJ DEKA S/O- LATE BHUBANESWAR DEKA, R/O- PWD COLONY, NEAR OVER BRIDGE, P.O- DIBRUGARH, PIN- 786001, P.S- AND DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SPECIALSECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, P W ROADS DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI- PIN- 781006 2:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWDROADS ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI- 781003 3:THE TENDER EVALUATION COMMITTEE REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWDROADS ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI- 781003 4:M/S BB ENTERPRISE BEING REP. BY ITS ONE OF THE PARTNERS SRI BIJOY SHARMAH HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 1ST FLOOR M G CENTRE A T ROAD TINSUKIA-78615 ASSAM 5:NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT REP. BY THE CHIEF MANAGER G S ROAD DISPUR GUWAHATI- 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.N DEB, MS.M DEV,MS.P DEB Advocate for the Respondent : MR. U K NAIR (R4), ,GA, ASSAM,MR. A CHETRY (R4),MR. M P SARMA (R4),MS. N SHYAMAL (R4),MR A SHARMA (R4) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER Date : 27.06.2025 Heard Ms. M. Dev, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Nath, learned Standing Counsel for the PWD. 2. The petitioner is assailing the decision of the authorities to award the road contract in favour of the respondent No. 4 3. The petitioner’s case is that the respondent No. 4 did not have the credential to participate in the tender process and despite pointing out the said fact to the authorities, the authorities have awarded the contract to the respondent No. 4, by depriving the eligible bidders like the petitioner. 4. Mr. D. Nath has submitted project completion certificate and project completion report dated 16.08.2019, issued by the Executive Engineer, PWRD, Dibrugarh, Lahowal, Moran & Tingkhong Territorial Road Division, which states that the road construction commenced on 24.05.2017 and that the same was completed on 30.07.2019 5. The project completion report and project completion certificate are made a part of the record and marked as Annexure- X & Y respectively. 6. As the respondent No. 4 has completed the contract work, in terms of the Annexure- X & Y, the matter has become infructuous and any decision made on merit will only be of academic interest. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant