Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 146372 (ALL)

AMRENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME. LKO and OTHERS

A482/5712/2021 · 2025-01-17

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3285 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5712 of 2021 Applicant :- Amrendra Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home. Lko And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Chandra Tewari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present application has been filed for the following main relief(s):- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to pass an order to thereby quash the entire criminal proceeding as well as proceeding of 82 Cr.P.C. initiated against the petitioner arising out of case crime no.145 of 2021, under Section - 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station - Mahanagar, District - Lucknow. It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the proceeding of 82 Criminal Procedure Code arising out of case crime no.145 of 2021, under Section - 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station - Mahanagar, District Lucknow during the pendency of this petition." 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Inder Mohan Goswami and another vs. State of Uttranchal and others reported in (2007) 12 SCC 1, Sunil Tyagi vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and another reported in 2021 SCC OnLine Del 3597 and Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and the statement of counsel for the applicant that the applicant would appear before the court concerned, it is provided that if the applicant appears before the court concerned within two weeks from today and moves an appropriate application before the trial court including for recall of non-bailable warrant, the same shall be considered and decided by the trial court expeditiously strictly in accordance with law. 4. For a period of two weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant so far as the proceedings in issue are concerned. 5. In case, the applicant does not appear in terms of this order, coercive action shall be taken against him. 6. The present application is disposed of in above terms. Order Date :- 17.1.2025 Anand/- Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench