Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 146317 (ALL)

SHAKIL AHMAD v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DISTRICT AMETHI AND 21 OTHERS

WRIC/5900/2025 · 2025-07-23

Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42189-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5900 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shakil Ahmad Respondent :- District Magistrate, District Amethi And 21 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Onkar Singh,Mohiuddin Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. If pattas have been illegally granted in respect of a land which petitioner claims to be his then the remedy is not under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. He has to seek cancellation of patta, if he has a cause and locus standi or to seek such other remedies, as prescribed under the law. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner says that proceedings of patta cancellation under Section 66 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 have already been initiated and are pending but during its pendency construction is sought to be raised by the patta holders. Let the said proceedings, if otherwise, maintainable be concluded at the earliest and in the interregnum, if any application for interim relief is filed then the same shall be considered at the earliest say within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Writ petition stands disposed of. [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy,J] Order Date :- 23.7.2025 Ashish Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench