Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 146315 (ALL)

MUMTAZ ALI v. AJEET KUMAR, DISTRICT BASIC EDUCATION OFFICER, SITAPUR

CAPL/1690/2022 · 2025-07-22

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42028 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1690 of 2022 Applicant :- Mumtaz Ali Opposite Party :- Ajeet Kumar, District Basic Education Officer, Sitapur Counsel for Applicant :- Suyesh Pradhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Shobhit Mohan Shukla,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Shri Varun Singh holding brief of Shri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for District Basic Education Officer, while filing affidavit of compliance duly sworn by the respondent no. 2-Mr. Akhilesh Pratap Singh, District Basic Education Officer, Sitapur, informs that the order of the writ Court has been complied with, as the bills have already been forwarded to the Treasury and token is also generated. It is also submitted that the amount would be credited in the account of the applicant within two days. It is, thus, submitted that the application has lost its efficacy and may be dismissed. The aforesaid affidavit of compliance is taken on record. The respondent-Officer is also present before this Court. 3. Considering the submissions of the learned Standing Counsel and going through the order of the writ Court as well as contents of the affidavit of compliance, this Court is of the view that the order of writ Court has already been complied with. 4. The application stands dismissed as infructuous. 5. However, it is open to the applicant that, in case, the amount is not credited in the account of the applicant, he may move recall application. Order Date :- 22.7.2025 VKS Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench