Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14630 (KAR)

SRI MARANAYAKA v. SRI BADAGI PALAIAH

WP/16671/2017 · 2025-01-28

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3709 WP No. 16671 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 16671 OF 2017 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI MARANAYAKA S/O LATE GADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT BELLIBATTLU VILLAGE, PAVAGADA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT -572 116 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJA S., ADVOCATE- ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI BADAGI PALAIAH S/O LATE OBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 2. SMT.PALAKKA D/O LATE BAJJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT RANGEROPPAM, BUDIBETTA GRAMA PANCHAYATH PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT- 572 116 3. SMT SAKAMMA W/O LATE PALAIAH AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 4. SRI GARADI PALAIAH S/O LATE PALAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 5. SRI OBAIAH S/O LATE PALAIAH , AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3709 WP No. 16671 of 2017 6. SRI OBELESHAPPA S/O LATE PALAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 7. SRI RAJAGOPALA S/O LATE PALAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 8. SMT LAKSHMIDEVAMMA W/O LATE GADRAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 9. SMT.PALAMMA W/O LATE GADRAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 10. SMT. CHANDRAMMA W/O GADRI PALAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 11. SRI.OBLAPATHI S/O LATE GADRAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 12. SRI.NAGARAJU S/O LATE GARADAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 13. SMT PALAKKA W/O THIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.1 & 3 TO 13 ARE R/AT BELLIBATTLU VILLAGE, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT- 572 116 13(A) SRI BELADA HANUMAPPA S/O LATE THIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT OBALAPURA VILLAGE RANGASAMUDRA POST Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI PAVAGADA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-561 202 - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3709 WP No. 16671 of 2017 13(B) SMT.PARVATHAMMA@RADHAMMA W/O THIPPESWAMY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT PONNASAMUDRA VILLAGE & POST Y.N.HOSAKOTE HOBLI PAVAGADA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-561 202 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.S.ERANNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R8, R10 R11- SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED V/O/D 12/4/22, R11 & R12 ARE TREATED AS LR’S OF R8 & R9 V/O/D 20/01/23 PETITION AGAINST R5 STANDS ABETED PRAPOSED R13 (A) & R13 (B) ARE SERVED & UNREPRESENTED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED: 21.09.2016 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC AT PAVAGADA, IN O.S.NO.397/2008 VIDE ANNEXURE-E. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ‘DISMISSAL’, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER On 21.01.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this matter was directed to be listed on 22.01.2025 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. On 25.01.2025 also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:3709 WP No. 16671 of 2017 2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. This Writ Petition is of the year 2017, steps are not taken to serve the notices on respondents even till now. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE BN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3