SMT. ANITA MEENA W/O SHRI SURENDRA MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/5455/2025 · 2025-04-21
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14629 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14629 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:16585] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5455/2025 Smt. Anita Meena W/o Shri Surendra Meena, R/o Village Ralawata, Tehsil Kotkhawda, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Mahila And Bal Vikas Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2. The Director, Integrated Child Development Services Department, 2, Jal Path, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur.
3. The Deputy Director, Integrated Child Development Services Department, 2, Jal Path, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur.
4. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Chaksu, District Jaipur.
5. The Child Development Project Officer, Mahila And Bal Adhikarita Vibhag, Kotkhawda, Chaksu, Jaipur.
6. Sunita Devi W/o Shri Panchuram, Resident Of 66, Naya Ralawata, Tehsil Kotkhawada, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prahlad Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Deepa Singh for Mr. Manju Joshi, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 21/04/2025
1. During course of arguments, counsel for petitioner admits that petitioner was allotted 5 marks whereas respondent No. 6 has been allotted 10 marks for the purpose of assessment of appointment on post of Anganwadi Worker at Village Ralawata, hence, challenge to the recommendation of respondent No. 6 for appointment is devoid of merits.
[2025:RJ-JP:16585] (2 of 2) [CW-5455/2025]
2. In that view of the matter, counsel for petitioner, having instructions of petitioner, does not want to press the writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not press.
4. However, it is open for the petitioner to make a representation before the respondents, in case respondent No. 6 is not eligible for appointment for want of non-resident of Village Ralawata.
5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /11