(MAHILA HEAD CONSTABLE , PNO - 112432313) SMITA PATEL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/6835/2025 · 2025-06-13
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146283 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146283 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35513 Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6835 of 2025 Petitioner :- (Mahila Head Constable , Pno - 112432313) Smita Patel Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Karan Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for all the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for following main reliefs:
"(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the impugned transfer order dated 20.05.2025 moved by the Opp. Party No.3, in which the name of the petitioner finds place at serial no. 161, so far it relates to the petitioner as contained in Annexure No.6 to this Writ Petition. (ii) A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the Opp. Party No.3 & 4 to allow the petitioner to work at Police Station Kotwali Barabnki till the completion of education session 2025-26 of petitioner's children, in the interest of justice." After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.3 i.e. Inspector General of Police, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 13.6.2025 Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench