RAKESH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/5232/2025 · 2025-06-16
Attau Rahman Masoodi, Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146281 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146281 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35574-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5232 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rakesh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A for the State and Sri Rajesh Kumar Agnihotri, Advocate who has put in appearance on behalf of the opposite parties no.4 and 5 and filed his vakalatnama, which is taken on record.
2. Under challenge in this petition is the First Information Report dated 02.05.2025 bearing Case Crime No.0074 of 2025, under Sections 281, 125(a), 125(b), 184 B.N.S., Police Station Sampurna Nagar, District Kheri.
3. The parties have already arrived at a compromise in respect of the occurrence, which is the subject matter of the impugned F.I.R.
4. The offences giving rise to the impugned F.I.R. are compoundable according to the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State. That apart a compromise settling an adequate compensation has also been brought on record.
5. This position is not disputed by the learned counsel for opposite parties no.4 and 5.
6. Once compoundable offences giving rise to the F.I.R. has
been settled amicably between the parties on payment of adequate compensation, there is no reason for the police authorities to proceed with the proceedings, culmination of which would otherwise not be of any consequence.
7. In these circumstances, the further proceedings in pursuance of the impugned F.I.R. are unwarranted and the impugned F.I.R. in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties deserves to be quashed.
8. We accordingly quash the impugned first information report and dispense with the pending proceedings of the F.I.R. impugned herein.
9. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. The settlement between the parties shall form a part of this order. [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.] Order Date :- 16.6.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench