Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14628 (RAJ)

NAJMEEN BANO D/O ABDUL HAMID v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/5465/2025 · 2025-04-17

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:16437] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5465/2025 1. Najmeen Bano D/o Abdul Hamid, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Upkar Bhawan, Silor Road, Lanka Gate, District Bundi, Rajasthan - 323001. 2. Ashish Kumar Arya S/o Jagdish Prasad Arya, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 24-D-2, Adarsh Nagar, Near Pratap Nagar, Borkhera, District Kota, Rajasthan - 324001. 3. Mohammed Shadab S/o Mohammed Rais, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Malarna Dungar, Post Malarna, Dungar, Tehsil Malarna, Dungar, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan - 322028. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj And Rural Development, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Director, Directorate Of Elementary Education, Bikaner, (Raj.). 3. The Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Sitabari, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302018, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Neel For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 17/04/2025 1. Petitioners preferred instant writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, impugning the provisional result dated 27.01.2025 prepared by the Rajasthan Staff Selection Board in furtherance to the judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench in [2025:RJ-JP:16437] (2 of 2) [CW-5465/2025] various writ petitions. In the provisional list, roll number of petitioners finds its place, however petitioners apprehend that they may not be selected in the final selection list. 2. Counsel for the petitioners at this stage, after having instructions from the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh, in case they are aggrieved, after issuance of the final selection list. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed for. 4. Stay applications and any other pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/9