[2025:RJ-JP:25279] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2251/2025 Satyanarayan S/o Chunni Lal Saini, R/o 87, Hanuman Enclave, Ganga Vihar, Bindayaka, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Govt. Hostel, M.i. Road, Jaipur. 4. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur (West). 5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Bindayaka, District Jaipur (West). ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2037/2025 1. Smt Neetu Kanwar W/o Devendra Singh, Resident Of Plot No 86, Hanuman Enclave, Ganga Vihar, Sirsi Mod, Police Station- Bindayaka, Jaipur. 2. Devendra Singh Son Of Shri Arjun Singh, Resident Of Plot No 86, Hanuman Enclave, Ganga Vihar, Sirsi Mod, Police Station- Bindayaka, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Satnarayan Saini Son Of Late Chunni Lal Saini, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Plot O. 87 Hanuman Enclave, Ganga Vihar, Sirsi Mod, Police Station- Bindayaka, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dileep Singh Jadaun with Mr. Balraj Singh Jadaun (In SBCRLMP No.2037/2025) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Dileep Singh Jadaun & Mr. Balraj Singh Jadaun (In SBCRLMP No.2251/2025) [2025:RJ-JP:25279] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2251/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 09/07/2025 In the instant bunch of petitions, vide order dated 19.05.2025, Court has granted interim protection to the petitioner(s) subject to joining investigation. Further, on 08.05.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2037/2025 similar interim protection was granted by the Court in favor of the petitioner(s). Considering the factual matrix of the matter and taking note of the fact that matter pertains to a financial transaction qua real estate, directions were passed to conduct inquiry in the instant matter in accordance with law including the provisions of Income Tax Act as enunciated in The Correspondence RBANMS Education Institution Vs. B. Gunashekar & Anr., Civil Appeal No.5200/2025. When the matter is called, learned counsel for the State has furnished a factual report and has submitted that investigation is ongoing in the instant matter and genuineness of transaction is under evaluation. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it apposite to dispose of the present petitions with direction that investigation be conducted in the instant matter by the concerned Authorities. Further, no coercive action be taken qua both the parties. It is made clear that the said interim protection is operational till filing of conclusion by the concerned authority. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/59-60