APHC010182472022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI I FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CjVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 855/2079 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution and decree dated 08-03-2022 in IANo.141 of 2021 in O.S.No.37 of 2011 the fiie of the court of Learned Senior Civii Judge, Chirala, Prakasam District. Between: of India, aggrieved order on 1. Nellipudi Gangarajamma, (Died) 2. Nellipudi Veera Bhramam, S/o. Venkata Rao Hindu, Senior Citizen, R/o.D.No.20-4-33 Chirala Town and Mandal, Prakasam District. Aged about years, Occ. Kasulamara Street, Clerk, ...Petitioners/Plaintiffs AND Muvvala Sujatha, W/o.Sambasiva Rao, Gopalnagar, Kothapeta village and Post District. Aged about 55 years, Hindu, R/o. Vetapalem Mandal, Prakasam ...Respondent/Defendant lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grapt stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.37 of 2011 on the file of the court of Learned Senior Civil Judge, Chirala, Prakasam District, pending disposal of the main C.R.P. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. VEERABHADRA CHARY Counsel for the Respondent: SRI MARRI VENKATA RAMANA The Court made the following ORDER: APHC010182472022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 855/2022 Between: ...PETITIONER{S) Nellipudi Gangarajamma and Others AND ...RESPONDENT Muvvala Sujatha Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI 2.V VEERABHADRA CHARY Counsel for the Respondent; 1.MARRI VENKATA RAMANA \ The Court made the following order; It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is placed 2. on record. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as 3. infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTlo^ Officer \ To, 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Chirala, Prakasam District. 2. One CC to Sri. V Veerabhadra Chary, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. Marri Venkata Ramana, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Three CD Copies Chp sree HIGH COURT DATED:20/06/2025 ORDER CRP 855 OF 2022 X \n9m „ ^ . Current Section J DISMISSING THE C.R.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS