Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15013 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2685 of 2024 Appellant :- Madhuresh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Shahid Kamal Siddiqui,Arun Sinha,Atul Kumar,Kunwar Sushant Prakash,Ram Chandra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Vivek Shukla Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for the private respondent, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. The present appeal has been filed for setting aside the impugned order dated 1.6.2024 passed by Special Judge SC/ST Act/Additional Sessions Judge, Unnao in Bail Application No. 1192/2024 (Madhuresh and another Vs. State of U.P.) arising out of Case Crime No. 74/2023 under Sections 147, 323, 364, 302/34 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act, Police Station- Asiwan, District- Unnao. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have been falsely implicated in the present case and they are in jail since 11.5.2023. They do not have any criminal antecedents. He further submits that the trial of case in question is not going on and still today only four witnesses have been examined out of 25 witnesses and they have not supported the prosecution version. He also submits that other co-accused namely Saurabh and Jaduresh Singh @ Jagga have already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 6.3.2025 passed in Criminal Appeal Nos. 441 of 2025 and 3648 of 2024 respectively. He next submits that in the present case, there is no possibility to conclude the trial in near future, therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside and the appellants are entitled to be released on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A. have vehemently opposed the prayer of appellants but they do not dispute this fact that all the four witnesses of fact, who have already been examined before the Trial Court, have not supported the prosecution version. 5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, going through the contents of impugned order as well as FIR and other relevant material, all the four witnesses of fact, who have already been examined before the Trial Court, have not supported the prosecution version and the other co-accused have already been granted bail as aforesaid, this Court is of the view that learned trial court is failed to consider the aforesaid aspects, hence, the aforesaid impugned order is liable to be set aside and appellants are entitled to be released on bail. 6. Resultantly, in the above facts and circumstances of the case, the trial of the case is not likely to be concluded in near future, hence, the present appeal has substance, and it is accordingly allowed, and the impugned order dated 1.6.2024 passed by Special Judge SC/ST Act/Additional Sessions Judge, Unnao in Bail Application No. 1192/2024 (Madhuresh and another Vs. State of U.P.) arising out of Case Crime No. 74/2023 under Sections 147, 323, 364, 302/34 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act, Police Station- Asiwan, District- Unnao is hereby set aside. 7. Let the appellant- Madhuresh and Rahul involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- (1) The appellants shall file an undertaking to the effect that they will not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The appellants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229- A of the Indian Penal Code. (iii) In case, the appellants misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure their presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iv) The appellants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed. 8. In case of breach of any of the conditions, it shall be ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 AKK Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench