Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14619 (AP)

V.Sudhakar Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7797/2019 · 2025-08-19

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010211452019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7797/2019 Between: 1. V.SUDHAKAR REDDY, S/ O V.NAGI REDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, WORKING AS ASSISTANT MANAGER CUM SUPERVISOR (UNDER SUSPENSION) KADAPA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD KAMALAPURAM BRANCH, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATION AND REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE KADAPA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER R.S.ROAD, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT - 516001. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N BHUPATHI GNANESHWAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2. CHALLA SIVASANKAR The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7797 OF 2019 O R D E R: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ of Mandamus, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents in finalizing the disciplinary proceedings in pursuant to Suspension Proceedings dated 29-03- 2016 is in violation of G.O.Ms.No. 526 dated 19-08-2008 and opposed to Dicta laid down by the Apex Court and illegal, highhanded action, arbitrary, violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same along with all consequential benefits.…” 2. None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 20.08.2025 PSK 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 84 WRIT PETITION No:7797 OF 2019 Date: 20.08.2025 W PSK