GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THRU. VICE CHAIRMAN v. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION U.P. and 2 ORS.
WRIC/8259/2016 · 2025-04-23
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146165 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146165 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23015 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8259 of 2016 Petitioner :- Ghaziabad Development Authority Thru. Vice Chairman Respondent :- State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission U.P. And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Khare Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rahul Srivastava,Surangama Sharma,Vaibhav Pandey Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Order on I.A. No.10 of 2025:
1. The application for amendment has been filed which seeks to amend the petition insofar as the payment of the amounts is concerned.
2. The same cannot be accepted at this stage.
3. The application is accordingly rejected.
Order on Writ Petition:
4. Additional rejoinder affidavit filed today in Court is taken on record.
5. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 17.03.2016 passed by the appellate forum under the Consumer Protection Act arising out of the execution proceedings.
6. In the execution proceedings in between the parties, an order came to be passed by the District Forum directing the petitioner to execute the lease deed within a period of 30 days failing which action shall be taken under Section 27.
7. Challenging the said order, an appeal was preferred. The appellate Court by means of the impugned order has dismissed the appeal and has directed that the order dated 22.01.2016 is confirmed and be complied with.
8. Considering the fact that the order has been passed in the execution proceedings, no interference is called for under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India.
9. Present petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 23.4.2025 nishant Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench