Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 146144 (ALL)

DEEPTI VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF SOCIAL WELFARE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/6819/2025 · 2025-06-12

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35422 Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6819 of 2025 Petitioner :- Deepti Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Social Welfare Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Jauhari,Ambuj Kumar Bajpai,Shruti Sahu Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard Sri Manish Jauhari, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-State and perused the records. The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or command or direction in nature of Certiorari after summoning the record in original and partly quashing notice dated 28/08/2023 issued by respondent no. 3 in respect to condition being imposed for extension of services of petitioner and failing which the services of the petitioner will come to end which has been annexed herewith as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ, order or command or direction in nature of Certiorari after summoning the record in original and quashing notification dated 26/05/2025 to the extent of appointment of Lecturer (Maths) in Rajkiya Ashram Paddhiti Inter College, Chandan Chowki, Lakhimpur Kheri, which has been annexed herewith as Annexure No. 2 to this writ petition. (iii) Issue a writ, order or command or direction in nature of Certiorari after summoning the record in original and quashing recommendation of committee dated 03/12/2024 which has been annexed herewith as Annexure No. 3 to this writ petition." Taking note of the facts of the case as pleaded, this Court finds that at the first instance the decision should be taken by the concerned authority/opposite party no.2. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation annexing therewith all relevant documents in support of his case within two weeks from today before the opposite party no.2. If such a representation is filed, the opposite party no. 2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that his Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 12.6.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench