1`.` f/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AIVIARA THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3903 OF 2025 Betwee n : 1. Kannoju Hariprasad, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, Age 28 years, Occ: Artist in Cine field, R/o. D.No.8-3-169/813, HG Nagar, Phase-II, Borabanda, Hyderabad. 2. Thalia Phani Ganesh, S/o. late Sathyanarayana Age 45 years, Occ: Short film Editor R/o. D.No.304, Green Park Residence, RaJ'eeV Nagar, Hyderabad. ...Petitioners/ Accused No.4 and 5 AND / The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. ...Respondent Petition under Section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C (Corresponding Section 480 & 483 of BNSS), praying that in the circumstances stated in memorandum of grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioners/Accused Nos.4 and 5 on bail in connection with the Cr.No.9 of 2025] on the file of Parvathipuram Town Police Station, Parvathipuram Manyam District; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and memorandum of grounds of criminal petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K.Narsi Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and Public Prosecutor for the Respondent, the Court made the following ORDER; £ APHCO10182292025 IN THE HIG-H,,COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (special or]]ginal Jur|ISdiCtiOn) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3903/2025 Between: Kannoju Hariprasad and Others AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh counsel for the petitioner/accused(S)I. 1.K NARSI REDDY [3521] H.PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT counsel for the Respondent/cOmPIainant:. 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following ORDER|. The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity tthe BNSS), seeking to enlarge the petitioners/Accused Nos.4 & 5 on ba'll in Cr.No.09 of 2025 of parvatipuram Town Police Station, Vizianagara,m for the Offence Punishable under sections 319(2), 318(4) and 308(2) r/w 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya sanhita, 2023 (for brevity lthe BNS) and Section 66(D) of Information Technology Act, 2000-2008 (for brev-lty [the lT Act'). ~\ \t-, 2. The case of the prosecution, in nutshell, is that the petitioners along I+ with other accused cheated the de facfo complainant by threatening him and extracted huge amounts from him. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 4. Sri B.Rama Shankar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners were arrested only basing on the confession of Accused No.7. Accused No.4 did not receive any amount from the de facfo complainant. The petitioners are in judicial custody for the past 82 days. The petitioners would abide by any conditions to be imposed by this court and urged to allow the petition. 5. Per confra, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, opposed in granting of bail stating that the petitioners along with other accused extracted huge amount of money from the c/e racfo complainant. If the petitioners are enlarged on bail, they would not be available for the investigation since they are residents of Hyderabad, Telangana State and they would escape from the clutches of law and urged to dismiss the bail petition. 6. As seen from the record, the petitioners is in thejudicial custodyforthe past 82 days; 'If the Petitioners are enlarged On bail With Stringent conditions, they would not flee away from the clutches of the law and interest of the justice would be served. f~~ _ -pit 7. Keeping in view of the.period of detention undergone by the Petitioners // in judicial custody for the past 82 days, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail with the stringent conditions. 8. In the result, the criminal Petition iS allowed With the following conditions: _- er> ....-=tl-I i) The petitioners shall be enlarged On bail Subject {O the executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) each with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Parvatipuram. ii) The petitioners shall appear before the Station House Officer, Parvatipuram Town Pol'lce Station, Vizianagaram, on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till cognizance is taken by the learned Trial Court. iii) The petitioners shall not leave the limits Of the District without prior permission from the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Parvatipuram. iv) The petitioners shall not commit Or indulge in commission of any offence in future. v) The petitioners shall cooperate with the inVeStigat'lng officer in further investigation of the case and shall make \t-I \-``. a-```, + themselves available for interrogation by the investigating f/ officer as and when required. vi) The petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any,police officer. Sd/I M.Prabakar Rao //TRUE COPY// ISTRAR FFICER To, 1. The ll Additional District Judge, Parvathipuram. 2. The Additional Judicial First-Class Magistrate ParvathI-Puram. 3. The Superintendent, sub-jail, Parvathipuram Manyam. 4. The Station House Officer, Parvathipuram Town Police StatI'On, Parvathipuram Manyam District. 5. One CC to Sri. K.Narsi Reddy, Advocate [OPUe] 6. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAP [OUT] 7. One spare copy -MM ~-\ ae~ +-..> J HIGH COURT D r.YLR,J DATED :22/05/2025 ORDER CRLP.NoI3903 of 2025 ALLOWED