NILIMA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/5863/2025 · 2025-06-17
Attau Rahman Masoodi, Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146109 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146109 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35723-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5863 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nilima Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Newton Kishore Saxena,Mohd.Yasin,Shipra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. Heard Shri Newton Kishore Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Shailendra Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for Municipal Commissioner, Lucknow and Shri Vivek Tiwari along with Shri Ravi Patel, learned counsel for opposite party no.3. The petitioner has approached this Court against the notice issued on 31.05.2025 regarding an unauthorized encroachment upon the public utility land. The petitioner has yet to submit his reply in response thereto. At this stage, the petitioner prays that he may be granted two weeks time to respond to the notice issued on 31.05.2025. The reply submitted by the petitioner within the aforesaid period, if any, is expected to be decided expeditiously and preferably within a period of one month from the date of filing the objection. The consequential action, if any, shall follow in terms of the order passed by the Nagar Nigam. In case, the petitioner is aggrieved, he shall have liberty to avail the remedy open to him under law. In view of above, the petition is disposed of. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) (Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.) Order Date :- 17.6.2025 akhilesh/- Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench