KRISHNA PRATAP SINGH and ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. and ANR.
A482/4983/2017 · 2025-01-17
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146090 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 146090 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3162
Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4983 of 2017 Applicant :- Krishna Pratap Singh And Anr. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Anu Pratap Singh Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
1. Case called out. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant to press this application. However, learned AGA is present.
2. The matter pertains to the year 2017 and since then it is pending.
3. Application is accordingly rejected for non prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
4. However, it will be open for the applicant(s) to move recall application within eight weeks in case the cause of action still survives.
5. Office is directed to communicate this order to the court concerned forthwith for necessary action. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 17.1.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench