04.08.2025 47 Ct.No.7 sdas WPA 4601 of 2020 Dr. Vaishali Ray Srivastava Vs. West Bengal Medical Council & Ors. Mr. Saibalendu Bhowmik Mr. Raj Sekhar Basu …. for the respondent nos. 1 & 2 Petitioner is unrepresented. Mr. Bhowmik, learned Advocate representing the respondent nos. 1 and 2, submits that based on a complaint received against the petitioner, a doctor, a proceeding was initiated by the Medical Council. After following the due procedure the petitioner’s registration was cancelled for a period of three years. He also submits that three years have already been elapsed and thereafter petitioner applied for re- registration of her name as a practicing doctor under the Council. The petitioner’s application has been accepted and her name has been re-registered. In view thereof, he submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous. Having heard the learned Advocate for the respondent nos. 1 and 2, I express my agreement with the contention advanced by Mr. Bhowmik. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 2 There will be no order as to costs. (Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)