Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14602 (JHR)

THAKUR RAVIDAS ALIAS THAKUR RABIDAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3333/2024 · 2025-03-27

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 3333 of 2024 1. Thakur Ravidas @ Thakur Rabidas, aged about 35 years, son of Hirbal Ravidas @ Birbal Ravidas @ Birbal Rabidas; 2. Haripada Ravidas @ Haripad Ravidas @ Haripada Rabidas, aged about 35 years, son of Paresh Ravidas @ Lt. Paresh Ravidas @ Paresh Rabidas; 3. Chandan Ravidas @ Chandan Rabi Das @ Chandan Rabidas, aged about 22 years, son of Lachhman Ravidas @ Lakhan Ravidas @ Lachhman Rabidas; 4. Turan Ravidas @ Tufan Ravidas @ Tufan Rabi Das, aged about 35 years, son of Hariram Ravidas @ Lt. Hadiram Ravidas @ Hari Ram Rabi Das; All are Residents of Tiltoria, Madanpur, P.O. and P.S. Nırsa, District Dhanbad. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S.Mazunmdar , Adv. For the State : Mr. Sanant Kr. Jha , Addl.. PP 09 / 27.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Dhanbad Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 31 of 2023 registered under Sections 406, 409, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 66 (C ) & 66 (D) of I.T. (Amendment)Act, 2000. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners indulged in cyber-crime by opening an account in the name of the informant; in Federal bank. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and no one has come forward to say that, he has been cheated and in respect of whom, cyber-crime has been committed. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 21 of this anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security, hence, the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum- Special Judge, Cyber Cases, Dhaband in connection with Dhanbad Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 31 of 2023 subject to the condition that the petitioners will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.. . (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-