APHC010181502018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8473/2018 Between: 1. G RAMANJANEYULU, OCC CONTRACT LABOUR, R/O. D-NO. 13/165, SANJEEVA NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, PIN-515801, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. M. NEEMA NAIK, OCC CONTRACT LABOUR, R/O. D-NO. 6/900-110-J BHAGYA NAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, PIN-515801, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. MAHABOOB JEELAN, OCC CONTRACT LABOUR, R/O. D-NO. 12- 101, S.N. PET, GUNTAKAL ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, PIN-515801, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. B. ASHOK KUMAR, OCC CONTRACT LABOUR, R/O. D-NO. 12/257, SANJEEVANAGAR, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, PIN- 515801, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. M. BALA GOVINDA REDDY, OCC CONTRACT LABOUR, R/O. DIMMAGUDI VILLAGE, PEDDAVADAGUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE GOVT OF AP, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD, 19-13-65/A, SRINIVASAPURAM, TIRUCHANDOOR ROAD TIRUPATI 517503. REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, (OPERATION CIRCLE) ANDHRA PRADESH CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD., ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SANNIDHIRAJA MALLESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENERGY (AP) 2 2. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not following the apex court Vide I.A Nos. 176- 179 of 20016 in petitioner(s) for Special leave to Appeal (c) No (s). 25586-25589/2013, (arising out of impugned final judgment and order Dt. 14-03-2012 in WP. No. 21922/2011 and its batch passed by the Hon'ble High Court at Hyderabad) and consequently direct the respondents to allow the petitioners to continue in the same jobs.” 2. None represented for the Petitioners. 3. The docket proceedings dated 03.03.2025 would show that, none appeared for the Petitioners. It further shows that, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2 would submit that no further orders are required in this matter, since the Petitioners are not eligible for the appointment, in pursuance of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:05.03.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.8473 of 2018 Dt.05.03.2025 Dinesh