VINOD KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/5851/2025 · 2025-06-17
Attau Rahman Masoodi, Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145995 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145995 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35672-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5851 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anoop Kumar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Rakesh Kumar Tripathi learned counsel on behalf of the opposite party no. 6 is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Rakesh Kumar Tripathi learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of the opposite party no. 6.
3. The petitioner has confined his prayer only to the extent of interference by the police authorities regarding the subject matter of this writ petition i.e. shop which is claimed to be in the peaceful possession of the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the State on the basis of instructions has stated that the police authorities have no role in the private rights which the petitioner claims vis a vis opposite party nos. 6 to 8 except where it is necessary to maintain the law and order as per the order passed by the competent court.
5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition is disposed of. . [Subhash Vidyarthi,J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.] Order Date :- 17.6.2025/kanhaiya Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench