W.P.(MD) No.17318 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.06.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR W.P.(MD) No.17318 of 2025 1 Ramesh Kumar C 2 K.Jallal 3 Rabik Raja 4 Jam Jam Mehariba 5 Nagheswari 6 Inbanayaki 7 Krishnamoorthy 8 Kavitha ... Petitioners Vs 1 The Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 5. 2 The District Collector, Sivagangai. 3 The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.17318 of 2025 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai. 5 The Tahsildar, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent 2 to 5 to update the Online Mutation entries in the Patta, Chitta, and Adangal, relating to the respective properties of the petitioners under S.No.287/4, 289/4, 290/1, 290/2, 290/3, 292/2, 296/4, and 300/4 of Mangulam Group, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District, pursuant to the orders passed in W.P.No. 22048 of 2023, dated 19.03.2025, passed by the Honble Madras High Court, quashing the cancellation of the Assignment Patta of the petitioners. For Petitioners : Mr.K.R.Laxman For Respondents : Mrs.S.Jeya Priya, Govt. Advocate. ORDER The Writ Petition is filed, seeking a direction to respondent 2 to 5 to update the Online records, pertaining to the property situated in Survey No. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.17318 of 2025 287/4, 289/4, 290/1, 290/2, 290/3, 292/2, 296/4, and 300/4 of Mangulam Group, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District, pursuant to the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No. 22048 of 2023, dated 19.03.2025. 2. It is not in dispute that the subject property was originally assigned in favour of the vendor of the first petitioner, petitioners 2 to 4 and one Selvam. Subsequently, assignment order was cancelled on the ground that the petitioners violated certain assignment conditions. The said order was challenged by the petitioners in W.P.No.22048 of 2023 before this Court. The Writ Petition was allowed, quashing the order of cancellation. Therefore, the petitioners submitted a representation before the second respondent on 02.06.2025, seeking inclusion of their names in the digital revenue records. The same has not been considered. Hence, they have come before this Court. 3. Since the cancellation of the assignment order was already quashed by this Court in W.P.No.22048 of 2023, there may not be any impediment for the official respondents to consider the request of the petitioners for inclusion of their names in the digital revenue records. It is not the case of the respondents that the order passed in the above said Writ Petition has been challenged by way of an intra court appeal. 4. Under these circumstances, the fifth respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioners, dated 02.06.2025, and ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.17318 of 2025 positively pass orders for mutation of digital revenue records within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. 26.06.2025 NCC : Yes / No (2/2) Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No dixit To: 1 The Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 5. 2 The District Collector, Sivagangai. 3 The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai. 4 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai. 5 The Tahsildar, Manamadurai Taluk, Sivagangai District. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.17318 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR, J. dixit W.P.(MD) No.17318 of 2025 (2/2) 26.06.2025 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis