Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010133002025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3451/2025 MALIKA BEGUM WIFE OF SOHRAB ALI PRAMANIK @ SOHRAB ALI PORAMANIK, RESIDENT OF VILL- PUB ENKORBARI, P.S- DHALIGAON, DIST- CHIRANG, ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, INDIA- 110001. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF HOME DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-781007. 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CHIRANG DIST- CHIRANG ASSAM-783385 5:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CHIRANG DIST- CHIRANG Page No.# 2/4 ASSAM-783385. 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) CHIRANG DIST- CHIRANG ASSAM-783385. 7:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE DHALIGAON POLICE STATION DIST- CHIRANG ASSAM-783385 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R BHUYAN, MR M KHAN,MR S ABDULLAH Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 25.07.2025 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. A.R. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as all the respondents. 2. The case of the petitioner is that her husband, namely, Sohrab Ali Paramanik @Sohrab Ali Poramanik, was taken into custody on 25.05.2025 and thereafter his whereabouts were not known. 3. It is also projected in this writ petition that by an opinion dated 11.11.2016, passed by the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal, Chirang in Case No. BNGNFT (CHR)/72/12, arising out of P.E. No. 10/2012, is presently being held at the Holding Centre at 7th AP Battalion, Charaikhola in the district of Kokrajhar. 4. Thereafter, pursuant to communication dated 17.01.2020, issued by the Superintendent of Police, (Border), Chirang, Kajalgaon, the husband of the Page No.# 3/4 petitioner was released on conditional bail from the Transit Camp, Goalpara. 5. As the husband of the petitioner was again taken into custody by filing a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for protection of the husband of the petitioner and to return him to the custody of his family members, to quash the illegal detention of the husband of the petitioner and to direct the respondent authorities not to deport the husband of the petitioner without due process of law. 6. Pursuant to order dated 24.06.2025, the petitioner and one family member was permitted to meet the declared foreign national and to obtain his signature in the vakalatnama and to obtain instructions, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per instructions received by him, the petitioner and his family members could visit the Holding centre at 7th AP Battalion, Charaikhola in the district of Kokrajhar and the signature of the detained person is obtained in the vakalatnama. Accordingly, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the meanwhile, the husband of the petitioner may not be deported out of the Country without following due process of law. 7. Accordingly, the Court is of the considered opinion that as the opinion dated 11.11.2016, passed in the writ petition has attained finality by virtue of dismissal of WP(C)/7579/2016 by order dated 30.05.2017, and taking into consideration that the petitioner has been able to obtain signature of the husband of the petitioner in the vakalatnama, the Court is of the considered opinion that the purpose of this writ petition is served as the whereabouts of the husband of the petitioner is disclosed. 8. Accordingly, the petitioner is allowed to avail any such remedy as available to her or to a detained person in connection with the said opinion dated 11.11.2016. Page No.# 4/4 9. Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed without prejudice to the rights if any available to the petitioner or the detained foreign national namely Sohrab Ali Paramanik @Sohrab Ali Poramanik. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant