Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Cont.P.(MD) No.1573 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.04.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Cont.P.(MD) No.1573 of 2024 in W.P.(MD) No.1577 of 2024 R.Balachandar .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Pradeep Yadav, I.A.S., The Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai-600 009. 2.P.Sri Venkata Priya, I.A.S., The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, 4th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 006. 3.T.Abraham, I.A.S., The Commissioner, Directorate of Technical Education, 53, Sardar Patel Road, Anna University Campus, Guindy, Chennai-600 025. .. Respondents _________ p. 2 Cont.P.(MD) No.1573 of 2024 Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for their willful and wanton disobedience of the
order passed by this Court, dated 03.06.2024 made in W.P.(MD)No.1577 of 2024 under Contempt of Courts Act. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sakthi Rao For R1 & R3 : Mr.T.Amjad Khan For R2 : Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan
ORDER This contempt case has been filed complaining willful disobedience of the order dated 03.06.2024 in W.P.(MD)No.1577 of
2024.
2. On 12.02.2025, when this Court heard this contempt case, the
learned counsel for the 3rd respondent, on instructions, submitted that the Commissioner of Technical Education will issue appointment order to the petitioner shortly. Recording the same, this contempt petition was closed. Thereafter, this case is listed under the caption “for being _________ p. 3 Cont.P.(MD) No.1573 of 2024 mentioned” at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the fact that the order of this Court is not complied with, this contempt case was restored to its file and statutory notice was issued to the respondents on 28.02.2025. Accordingly, the respondents 2 and 3 personally appeared before this Court on 28.03.2025 and the appearance of the 1st respondent was dispensed with.
3. The learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 3 submits that, on 26.03.2025, the appointment order was issued to the petitioner. The
learned counsel for the petitioner also accepted the same.
4. In view of the above factual position, it appears that there is some delay in implementing the order of this Court. But considering that the delay is very less and in view of the fact that already appointment
order is issued to the petitioner, this Court intends to take lenient view towards the respondents in the contempt case. _________ p. 4 Cont.P.(MD) No.1573 of 2024
5. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed. 07.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes gbg To 1.Pradeep Yadav, I.A.S., The Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai-600 009. 2.P.Sri Venkata Priya, I.A.S., The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, 4th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 006. 3.T.Abraham, I.A.S., The Commissioner, Directorate of Technical Education, 53, Sardar Patel Road, Anna University Campus, Guindy, Chennai-600 025. _________ p. 5 Cont.P.(MD) No.1573 of 2024 BATTU DEVANAND, J. gbg Cont.P.(MD) No.1573 of 2024 Dated : 07.04.2025 _________