AYODHYA PRASAD RAWAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME, LUCKNOW AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/8088/2023 · 2025-09-04
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145884 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145884 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8088 of 2023 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
1. None appears for the applicant however, learned A.G.A. for the State- respondent is present.
2. Learned A.G.A.A on the basis of written instructions submits that applicant has been convicted hence the bail application has become infructuous.
3. In view of above, the bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 4, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shiv Shankar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shradha, Shubham Kumar Tripathi (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Ayodhya Prasad Rawat .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home, Lucknow And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench