Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35206 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5235 of 2025 Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Sahu Alias Sunil Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.0183 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 409 IPC, Police Station- Hathigawan, District- Pratapgarh. 3. As per prosecution case, the applicant claimed himself as Manoj Kumar and worked 17 years as assistant teacher and withdrew salary illegally and thereafter when this fact came to the notice the F.I.R. in question was lodged. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the present case and he is in jail since 03.02.2025. It is further submitted that the applicant was also implicated in one another case. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed and there is no possibility of tampering with the evidence. In these circumstances, the applicant is entitled for bail. In case of being enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant and submits that the applicant by impersonating himself as Manoj Kumar and using his documents obtained appointment as assistant teacher and worked in the department as assistant teacher for about 17 years and withdrew salary and, therefore, he is not entitled to be released on bail. 6. Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and going through the contents of FIR as well as other relevant documents, as the applicant is claiming that he has been falsely implicated and he has no concerned with the said appointment, I find it to be a fit case for grant of bail. 7. Let the applicant- Sunil Kumar Sahu alias Sunil Kumar, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions: (i) The applicant shall not commit or participate in any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iv) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A IPC. (v) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A IPC. (vi) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Order Date :- 10.6.2025 MVS/- Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench