HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 649 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Verma, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Manish Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records. 2. The applicant was granted interim anticipatory bail by means of the following order passed on 10.06.2025 by a Coordinate Bench of this Court: "1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants in Case Crime No.465 of 2024, under Sections 3(5), 115(2), 131, 109 of B.N.S., Police Station Mallawan, District Hardoi with the prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that statement of the injured do not indicate any specific role upon the applicant of having inflicted injuries. It is next submitted that the co-accused Shiv Ratan Yadav has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.5.2025 passed in Crl. Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 502 of 2025. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that he may be granted an opportunity to file counter affidavit. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Arjun Singh Somvanshi Dinesh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. I have considered the argument of the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the F.IR. and the offences alleged. 6. Keeping in view the reasons, as stated above, as also the facts and circumstances of the case, a case for interim bail to the applicant is made out. 7. In the event of arrest of the applicant, namely, Dinesh Yadav in the aforesaid case, he shall be released forthwith by the Station House Officer of the police station concerned, on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with the following condition:- (i) The accused-applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; and (ii) The accused-applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. 8. However, it is directed that the applicant will join and participate in each and every aspect of the proceedings. 9. List this case on 4.7.2025 for final disposal. 10. In the meantime, learned A.G.A. may file counter affidavit. " 3. Learned Counsel for the opposite party no.2 has put in appearance by filing vakalatnama on 18.07.2025 but neither the State nor the opposite party no.2 has filed any counter affidavit. 4. In these circumstances, this Court finds no good ground to take a view different from the view taken by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 10.06.2025 granting interim anticipatory bail to the applicant. 5. In view of above, the interim order dated 10.06.2025 is made absolute and the anticipatory bail application is allowed in terms of the aforesaid order. September 22, 2025 V. Sinha NABAIL No. 649 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench