VARNIT @ BHOLU DWIVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND
BAIL/5259/2025 · 2025-06-10
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145848 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145848 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35164 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5259 of 2025 Applicant :- Varnit @ Bholu Dwivedi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Counsel for Applicant :- Poonam Maurya,Shashank Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. and perused the record. 2. The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.37 of 2025 under Sections 281, 105 BNS, Police Station Loni Katra, District Barabanki, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the present case and he is in jail since 18.04.2024. As per the prosecution story, applicant was driving a tractor and an accident was taken place, in which, a minor child aged about 3 years, died. He further submitted that applicant is having no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has already been filed in the present case and there is no possibility of tampering of evidences. In these circumstances, the applicant is entitled for bail. In case of being enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer of the applicant for grant of bail but he does not dispute this fact that applicant is in jail since 18.04.2024 and charge sheet has already been filed. 5. Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for parties, material available on record, contents of the F.I.R., other relevant documents as well as totality of fact and circumstances, it is evident that the alleged incident was taken place due to an accident. It is also evident that the applicant is in jail since 18.04.2024 and charge-sheet has already been submitted. Therefore, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 6.
Let applicant - Varnit @ Bholu Dwivedi - be released on bail in aforesaid Case Crime, on his furnishing personal bond
and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not commit or participate in any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iv) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A IPC. (v) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A IPC. (vi) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 10.6.2025 V. Sinha Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench