IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARA THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY.. TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3892 OF 2025 Between : Pinniboyina Lakshmi Naryana, S/o. Subba Rao, Aged 38 Years, Occ. GRP Constable, R/o. Guntakal, N/o. D.No.50-13O, Gavinivaripalem Village, Bapatla District (Erstwhile Pr`akasam District) ...Petitioner/Accused No.6 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...Respondent/complaI-nant Petition under section 482 of BNSS/ Under See,lion 438 of Cr.P.C, Praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed i'n support of the crimI-nal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory Bail to the petitioners by directing the station House Officer, Chirala Rural Police Station Bapatla District to release the petitioners/Accused No. 6 on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with crime No.55 of 2025 of Chirala Rural P.S., Bapatla District (Erstwhile Prakasam District). The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI Advocate for the petitioner, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent, the court made the following lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3892/2025 Between : Pinniboyina Lakshmi Narayana ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): } 1.AKURATHI RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the fo]lowinq Order:- The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, by the petitioner/A6 for granting of pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No.55 of 2025 of Chirala Rural Police Station, Bapatla District, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 49 r/w 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, EZI -+ 2023 ('for brevity {the BNSJ). 2. 2. Facts, in brief, of the case are that the incident OCCurred On 30.03.2025 at about 8.30 hours at Gavin-lvaripalem Village, Chirala Mandal and the same was reported in the POliCe Station On the Same day at ll.00 hours by the hospital intimat-Ion and Statement Of defacto complainant that he is working as clSF constable at Taj Mahal, Agra, Uttar Pradesh State wherein Al to A5 have developed animosity against the complainant due to land boundaries dispute between Al and grandmother of complainant, Wa'lting for an opportunity and with an intention to do away the life of the complainant, the accused armed with knives being used to slash -_ -` palm fruits and rod, among them Veeraiah called the comPlainant while he was present at the house of their relative Padavala seshaiah. when the defacto compla-lnant went on to the road, instantly Al to A5 attacked him, abused in filthy language demanding how he would decide the boundaries, among them and A2 shouted loudly to hack him, on that A3 tried to hack Witf, knife being used to slash palm fruits, the complainant kept his hands across the knife and caused bleeding injury on below elbow. Then A2 took the knife from A3 and hacked him, when the COmPlainant kept his left hand across the knife and received bleeding injury on below left hand shoulder_and back side of left elbow, then A4 I ? '.,' hacked the complainant on his left thigh with knife and caused bleeding injury from left thigh to knee, then A5 beat him with iron rod over his back and caused swelling injuries. The defacto complainant fell down on the ground, on that A4 dragged him for some distance. Meanvyhile Gavini Nalla Somaiah and some neighbours witnessed the incident and rescued him from the hands of accused. Then the complainant was shifted to GAH, Chirala for treatment. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence and he was falsely implicated in this +-~-_- case. The petitioner would abide by any condition to be imposed by this court. 5. Per confra, Ms. P. Akila Naidu, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, opposed in granting of bail on the ground that some more material witnesses have {o be examined,- investigation is not completed; if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, he would not be available for the investigation and he would escape from the clutches of law; and urged to dismiss the bail petition. t,`l-a I {fe/:£rfzar 6. A perusal of the material on record, it shows that the -I--''. petitioner/A6 was not named in the FIR lodged by the defacto complainant. However, the petitionerJs name was later included in the remand report, which alleged that he was involved tin the commission of the offence under Section 109(1) read with Section 3(5) of tthe BNS7. lt is not in dispute_that the petitioner is working as a GRP Constable at GuntakaI. ln view of the nature of the allegations made against the petitioner, his alleged role in the case, and the gravity of the offence, this Court is inclined to consider the petitioner]s request for grant of anticipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, this criminal petition is allowed with the following directions: a) In the event of arrest of the petitioner, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only), with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials; b) The petitioner shall make himself available for investigation as and when required; c) The petitioner shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses; I t`S` d) The petitioner shall appear before the station House Officer concerned once in a ee9ntb i.e., On every Second Saturday between 10.00 a.m., and 05.00 p.m., till filing of the charge sheet. e) The petitioner shall not leave the district limits without the express permission from the Station House Officer concerned. SD/-G.HELANAIDU ASSISTA ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECT "2ng -lON OF OFFICER It( To, 1. The Station House Officer, Chirala Rural Police Station, Bapatla District (Erstwhile Prakasam DI-Strict) 2. One CC to SRl. RAMAKRISHNAAKURATHI Advocate [opuc] i 3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra pradesh [OUT] 4. One spare copy PSR HIGH COURT DR.YLR,J DATED :29/05/2025 ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER 9RLP.No.3892 of 2025 ALLOWED ``\`-- _,__-^.r .. .lit