BHAJAN SINGH ETC. v. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER PUNJAB CHD.ETC.
CWP/15482/2001 · 2025-10-27
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145775 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145775 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
**** 202
CWP-15482-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.10.2025
BHAJAN SINGH AND ANR. ...Petitioners Vs.
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER PUNJAB CHD. AND ORS.
…Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners
Ms. Neha Sonawane, DAG, Punjab
Ms. Anmol Thakur, Advocate for
Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for respondent No.13
*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
On 08.10.2025, the following order was passed by this Court:-
“There was no representation of petitioners on 01.09.2025, though Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate appeared on behalf of petitioner No.2 on 01.07.2025. Even today, there is no representation of petitioners.
Learned counsel for respondent No.13 seeks short accommodation.
Adjourned to 27.10.2025.
It is made clear that petition shall be liable to be dismissed in case there is no representation of the petitioners on the adjourned date.”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has no instructions and may be granted liberty to move an appropriate application, if cause survives.
DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.10.27 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-15482-2001 (O&M)
-2-
3.
Disposed of with liberty to petitioners to move an appropriate application within six months from today, if cause survives.
4.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE October 27, 2025 Deepak DPA
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.10.27 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document