RUMAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. RAHAT AYUKTA RAJ BHAWAN COLONY LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/5837/2025 · 2025-06-16
Attau Rahman Masoodi, Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145761 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145761 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35585-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5837 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ruman Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Rahat Ayukta Raj Bhawan Colony Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Yadav,Hema Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The grievance raised in the present writ petion is already subjudice in a representation filed by the petitioner before the District Magistrate, Raebareli as contained annexure no. 6 to the writ petion.
3. Without commenting anything on the merit of the case, the District Magistrate, Raebareli is hereby directed to consider and pass a reasoned order on the pending representation within four weeks on production of a copy of this order.
4. In case it is relevant for the District Magistrate, Raebareli to call for the viscera report before disposal of the pending representation, it is expected of him to call for the viscera report and decide the pending representation accordingly in accordance with law.
5. The writ petion is accordingly disposed of. . [Subhash Vidyarthi,J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.] Order Date :- 16.6.2025 kanhaiya Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench