TRIBHUWAN YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI AND ANOTHER
WRIA/6808/2025 · 2025-06-12
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145755 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145755 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35414 Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6808 of 2025 Petitioner :- Tribhuwan Yadav Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Ministry Of Home Affairs, New Delhi And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kr. Misra Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Surya Bhan Pandey, learned Senior Advocate and Deputy Solicitor General of India assisted by Shri Varun Pandey, learned counsel for all the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for following main reliefs:
"i) Issue writ order or direction in nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 13.05.2025 in respect of petitioner, contaioned at Annexure No.1, in the interest of justice. ii)Issue writ order or direction in nature of mandamus commanding to the opposite party No.2 that he consider the case of petitioner and transfer/post/adjust the petitioner from 11th Bn. of Boarder Security Force to 86 Bn. of Boarder Security Force, Lucknow, in the interest of justice" After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 i.e. Director General, Border Security Force (Personnel Directorate), (Establishment Section), Block -10, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.2 then respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order, most expeditiously, in accordance with law and the relevant rules. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this order shall not be construed as an interim protection to the petitioner. Order Date :- 12.6.2025/Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench