IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Pet No.564 of 2025 Decided on: 08.08.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Nagesh Kumar and Ors ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 04.08.2025 from the Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, granting the benefits to respondents No.2 and 9. As per office instructions, cases of the remaining respondents are not similar to that of Mohit Sharma and Anr. Vs. State of H.P. and others2 , therefore, the same were rejected under office order dated 25.07.2025. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2 CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024. - 2 - 2. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that arrears due to the petitioners in terms of the aforesaid office order shall be released by the respondents within six weeks. 3. Taking note of the aforesaid office instructions and office orders as also the submissions made by learned Additional Advocate General, this execution petition to stand disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of their surviving grievances, including against the consideration orders, in accordance with law at an appropriate stage. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge August 8, 2025 R.Atal