Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14567 (JHR)

SURESH MAHTO v. SRI P M PRASAD THE CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR

Cont.(Cvl)/378/2023 · 2025-01-03

S N Pathak

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C) No. 378 of 2023 ---------- Suresh Mahto, aged about 56 years, S/o-Late Alo Mahto, Resident of village Panadih, P.O.-Paduma, P.S. Manatu, Dist.-Palamau, PIN Code-822123, State-Jharkhand ………… Petitioner Versus 1.Sri P. M. Prasad, The Central Coalfields Ltd., Ranchi through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Kutchery Road, Dist.-Ranchi, (Jharkhand)-834029 2.Mr. Harsh Nath Mishra, Director Personnel, CCL, Kutchery Road, Dist.- Ranchi, (Jharkhand)-834029 3.Shri Vinay Ranjan, General Manager (P & IR), CCL, At-Kutchery Road, Dist.-Ranchi, (Jharkhand)-834029 4.Shri Amresh Singh, Chief General Manager (Barka-Sayal Area), CCL, At- Rajrappa, Dist.-Ramgarh (Jharkhand)-829101 5.The Staff Officer (Barka-Sayal Area), CCL, At-Rajrappa, Dist.-Ramgarh (Jharkhand)-829101 6.The Project Officer, Sayal ‘D’ Colliery, CCL, At- Rajrappa, Dist.- Ramgarh(Jharkhand)-829101 7.The Senior Officer (P & A), Urimari Underground Colliery, CCL, At- Charhi, Dist.-Hazaribagh (Jharkhand)-825336 8.The Colliery Manager, Urimari Underground Colliery, CCL, At-Charhi, Dist.-Hazaribagh (Jharkhand)-825336 9.The Inquiry Officer, Aftab Ahmad, Urimari Underground Colliery, CCL, At-Charhi, Dist.-Hazaribagh (Jharkhand)-825336 ………… Opp. Parties ------- CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioner : Ms. Khalida Haya Rashmi, Advocate For the O.Ps. : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate Mr. Shivam Utkarsh Sahay, Advocate ---------- 20/ 03.01.2025 Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that substantial compliance is there. Since they have moved SLP, such compliance shall be subject to outcome of SLP. 2. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, no contempt is made out and the same is hereby dropped. 3. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) Rohit/-