Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 145608 (ALL)

VINOD SINGH AND 3 OTHERS v. STATEOF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/5136/2025 · 2025-06-12

S Q H Rizvi, Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35339-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5136 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinod Singh And 3 Others Respondent :- Stateof U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Singh Bisen,Pallavi Mishra,V.P. Singh Bisen Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State/respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Vaibhav Mishra, Advocate, who has filed counter affidavit alongwith Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent No. 4 in the Court today, which is taken on record, as well as perused the material placed on record. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 24.05.2025 bearing Case Crime No. 88 of 2025 under Section 191(2), 191 (3), 190, 127 (2), 109, 117 (2), 352, 351 (3) B.N.S. at Police Station Hathigawan, District Pratapgarh lodged by the opposite party No. 4, so far relates to the petitioners contained as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of MANDAMUS commanding the Opposite Parties not to arrest or harass the petitioners on the basis of the impugned First Information Report mentioned above contained as annexure No. 01." After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to take recourse to the remedy available under Section 482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short "BNSS"). Section 482 BNSS, referred, is extracted hereunder:- "482. Direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arrest.-(1) When any person has reason to believe that he may be arrested on an accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence, he may apply to the High Court or the Court of Session for a direction under this section; and that Court may, if it thinks fit, direct that in the event of such arrest, he shall be released on bail. (2) When the High Court or the Court of Session makes a direction under sub- section (1), it may include such conditions in such directions in the light of the facts of the particular case, as it may think fit, including- (i) a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) a condition that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; (iv) such other condition as may be imposed under sub-section (3) of section 480, as if the bail were granted under that section. (3) If such person is thereafter arrested without warrant by an officer in charge of a police station on such accusation, and is prepared either at the time of arrest or at any time while in the custody of such officer to give bail, he shall be released on bail; and if a Magistrate taking cognizance of such offence decides that a warrant should be issued in the first instance against that person, he shall issue a bailable warrant in conformity with the direction of the Court under sub-section (1). (4) Nothing in this section shall apply to any case involving the arrest of any person on accusation of having committed an offence under section 65 and sub- section (2) of section 70 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023." Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with aforesaid liberty. However, it is directed that in case the petitioners approach the court of competent jurisdiction by way of moving appropriate application under Section 482 BNSS, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, with expedition. [Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.] [Saurabh Lavania,J.] Order Date :- 12.6.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench