SURAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LUCKNOW
BAIL/7976/2023 · 2025-09-16
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145607 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7976 of 2023 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Case called out. None appears for the applicant. Learned AGA for the State is present. Learned AGA, based upon written instructions, submits that the applicant- Suraj has been convicted by the trial court. Thus, the bail application has rendered infructuous. In view of the statement of learned AGA, the bail application is dismissed as infructuous. September 16, 2025 Shravan Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shadab Waheed, Syed Raza Mehdi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Suraj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench