HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR AND PROJECT DIRECTOR PIU MANDI v. OMA DEVI AND ORS
OMPM/361/2025 · 2026-04-02
Virender Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1456 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1456 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Highway Administrator and Project Director Vs Oma Devi & Ors.
OMP(M) No. 361 of 2025 02.04.2026 Present: Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.
1. Ms. Ayushi Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 2 & 3. In view of the no objection, made by learned counsel, appearing for respondent No. 1, the application, under consideration, is allowed and the delay in filing the accompanying Arbitration Appeal is ordered to be condoned. Application is, thus, disposed of. Arb. Appeal No. _______ of 2026 Vide order of the even date, passed in OMP(M) No. 361 of 2025, the delay in filing the appeal has been ordered to be condoned. Be registered. Call for the record.
OMPST No. 38161 of 2025 Application is considered and allowed. During the pendency of the appeal, which has been admitted, the execution of the award dated 03.11.2023, passed by the Divisional Commissioner Mandi, exercising the power of Arbitrator, is ordered to be stayed, subject to
the condition that the applicant shall deposit the entire awarded amount, along with uptodate interest, within a period of eight weeks, from today. The application stands disposed of. Alteration/modification/vacation on motion. ( Virender Singh )
Judge 02nd April, 2026 (Pramod Kumar)