SMT. PRASUNA PUSHPAKAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND OTHERS
CRLP/5184/2025 · 2025-06-17
Attau Rahman Masoodi, Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145576 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 145576 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35660-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5184 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Prasuna Pushpakar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Nath Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A., who appears on behalf of the State-respondents. 2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers:-
"I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to create any hindrance and interference in peaceful matrimonial living of the petitioners in the interest of justice. II. A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties provide protection safety and security to the life and liberty of the petitioners as they are major in age and married living peaceful life in the interest of justice."
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.2 are both major, who on their own volition and free will have got married to each other in accordance with Hindu rites and rituals on 02.06.2025, however the family members of petitioner no.1 are unhappy with such marriage. In support of his submission that petitioners no. 1 and 2 are major, learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn our attention to the annexure nos.2 and 3 to the petition, which make out the point. The petitioners are apprehending harassment at the end of opposite party No.4, who is the sister of the petitioner no.1. It is therefore prayed that they be
granted the benefit of the judgement rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh vs. State of U.P. and another reported in 2006 (5) SCC 475 and the observations made in paragraph 17 which reads as under:-
"17.....
We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities throughout the country will see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a women or man who is a major, the couple is not harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence, and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law."
4. This Court has found from the perusal of judgement rendered in Lata Singh's case (supra) wherein the appellants had approached the Supreme Court against the police harassment because of F.I.R. being lodged by the brother of appellant no.1. 5. In the case of the petitioners there is no F.I.R. lodged. The police cannot be presumed to harass the petitioners only under the influence of the private respondent No.4. The action of Police is governed by the provision of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as B.N.S.S.). Particularly, Chapter XIII of B.N.S.S., corresponding Chapter XII of Cr.P.C., makes provision for information to Police and their power to investigate. In absence of any proof of such information regarding which the provision has been made under Sections 173 and 174 of B.N.S.S., corresponding Sections 154 and 155 of Cr.P.C., respectively, it will not be justified to grant a blanket protection to the petitioners as prayed. 6.
This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners that in case they are being threatened by their
family members, they may file an application under Section 154(2) or 154(3) of the Cr.P.C. (corresponding Sections 173(2) or 173 (3) of B.N.S.S.) before the Police Station/ Superintendent of Police concerned, or move an application under Section 156 (3) of the Cr.P.C. (corresponding Section 175(3) of B.N.S.S.) before the Magistrate concerned or file a complaint case under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. (corresponding Section 223 of B.N.S.S.) before the authorities concerned. 7. It is provided that the petitioners shall get their marriage registered by making an appropriate application under the Uttar Pradesh Marriage Registration Rules, 2017. [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.] Order Date :- 17.6.2025 cks/- Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench