lN THE HIGH couRT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl Lri THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE -.PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3872 OF 2025 # Between : shaik yaseen, s/o Mehaboob Subhani, Aged 25 years, R/o Bheem.avaram village, yeerupalem Mandal, Khammam District, Now residing at Rayadurgam, Manikonda, Hyder?bad. ...petitioner/Accused No.1 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through Station House Officer, Nandigama pol'ICe Station, NTR District, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh At Amaravat ...Respondent/Complainant petition under section 480 & 483 of BNSS (Old Sections 437 & 439 of cr.p.c), praying that in the c'lrcumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the cri-minaI Petition, the H'lgh Court may be pleased to release the petitione`i-6n bail in Crime No.89/2025 Dated 02-03- 2025, On the file of the Nand'lgama Pol'lee Station, NTR Commissionerate. counsel forthe Petitioner : Sri Veladi Sai Sri Harsha counsel for the Respondent' : Assistant Publ-IC Prosecutor. The Court made the following ORDER: +++++++++++++ + ++/ APHCO10180702025 EEET IN THE HIGH JcouRT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3872/2025 Between : Shaik Yaseen AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.VELADI-SAI SRI HARSHA [3369] ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Respondent/complainant 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Criminal Petition, u/Sec.480 & 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petl-tioner/A1, seeking bail, in Crime No.89/2025 of Nandigama, NTR Commissionerate. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner/Al and others for the offence punishable u/Sec.85,109(1), 332(c), 329(4) I/w 3(5) B.N.S. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondenvstate. 4. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, the defacto complainant is resident of Chandamamapeta of Nandigama town and Al is her husband | iiii= \. 2 and A2 to A5 are family-'members of Al and A6 is relative of Al to A5 and the marriage of defacto complainant performed with Al at about one year back and at the time of marriage, some amount, gold and house hold articles were given to Al and Al informed that he has completed Hotel Management and doing job at Hyderabad. Defacto complainant joined with Al at Hyderabad to lead marital life and she came to know that Al has no job and he is having illicit relationship with one Salma and when questioned, Al informed that he married her for dowry. The material on record would further disclosed that from the beginning of marriage all the family members of Al harassed her physically and mentally and later, Al brought Salma to their house and continued the illegal affair with Salma and assaulted the defacto complainant. While things stood thus, on 23.02.2025 at ll.00 pm, Al along with A6 forcibly entered into her house and threatened her and also tried to stab her with a view to kill her and the defacto complainant sustained injury on right hand heel and when she defending herself and in the meantime, mother of the defacto complainant intervened and neighbours also came there. By seeing them the accused ran away. Al married defacto complainant for the sake of dowry and harassed her from the beginning of marriage by continuing his illegal affair with A5 and on 23.02.2025 at ll.00 pm, Al and A6 attempted to kill the defacto complainant and caused injuries on her. Basing on the complaint, the crime was registered and investigated into. During the course of investigation, arrested Al and A6 on 04.3.2025 ErE 3 5. Heard. Perused the record. 6. Learned counsel for the Petit'lOner Submits that the defaCtO compla'lnant is none other than the w|lfe of this petitioner and she foisted this false case against the petitioner due to family disputes and the ingredients of see.109(1) of B.N.S. have nO aPP''lCatiOn and the Petitioner has been in judicial custody from o4.3.2025 and most Of the investigation might have been completed and prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor Submits that inVeStigat'lOn in th'lS case was not completed, some more witnesses are to be exam'lned and prays to d'lsmiss the criminal petition. He further subm'ltted that the petitioner has no previous antecedents. 8. After careful ObServat'IOn Of the material On record and Subm'lSSiOnS made on behalf of both s'ldes, it shows that the marriage of the defacto compla-lnant with the petitioner/Al performed about One year back aCCOrd'lng to Muslim rites. Allegations are that, he made an attempt On her life and the injury was caused on her right hand. when ascertained, learned Ass'lstant public prosecutor submitted that, according to his 'lnstructions, the defacto complainanvvictim was discharged from the hospital and there is no danger to her life. lt seems that the injury sa'ld to have sustained by the victim are shown to be simple injuries, since the petitioner has been I,n jud'lcial custody from o4.3.2025, this Court found that most Of the 'lnVeStigatiOn pertaining to the role played by the petitioner in the commission of offence might have been completed. The petitioner has Permanent abode, aS Such `` I 4 there is no possibility of his fleeing away from the justice. ln the facts of the case, this Court found that the release of the accused would not cause hampering of investigation and tampering of evidence. 9. ln the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following conditions: (i) The petitioner/Al herein shall be released on his executing a personal bond for Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nandigama; (ii) On release, the petitioner shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned once in a fortnight in between 10.00 a.m. and 01.OO p.m., for a period of three (03) months. (iii) the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence and hamper the investigation and shall cooperate for investigation. SD/- B.PR4sAD RA`O ASSISTANT For //TRUE COPY// L" SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Additional Judicial First class Magistrate, Nandl'gama. 2. The Superintendent, sub-Jal'l, Nandigama. 3. The Station House Officer, Nandigama Police Station, NTR DistrI-Ct. 4. One CC to Sri Veladi Sai Sri Harsha, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor (AP) High Court ofAndhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. One spare copy CVSS i_. i= i.,`. HIGH COURT TMR,J DATED:17/04/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.3872 of 2025 ALLOWED