Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14553 (AP)

MARUKURTI KARUNA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/9650/2025 · 2025-04-16

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010181152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 9650/2025 Between: Marukurti Karuna Kumar and The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. ALA CHANDRASEKHAR YADAV Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 9650/2025 Marukurti Karuna Kumar and another ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): ALA CHANDRASEKHAR YADAV Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following [3505] ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 ORDER: The petitioners claim is that they are the absolute owners and possessors of land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.60 cents in R.S.No.515 of Palacherla Village, Rajanagaram Mandal, East Godavari District. The petitioners further claim that the said property belongs to their family. They also stated that they have filed a suit vide O.S.No.2 of 2004 on the file of learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Rajamundry, for partition. Upon contest, the said suit was decreed by judgment and decree dated 30.10.2006 and the same was confirmed in the appeal vide A.S.No.252 of 2006 on the file of learned I Additional District Judge, Rajamundry. Thereafter, the petitioners filed an application vide F.D.I.A.No.804 of 2007 in O.S.No.2 of 2004 seeking to pass final decree. After consideration of the said application, the trial Court passed a final decree on 11.09.2017. Pursuant to the said final decree, the petitioners filed an application dated 16.12.2024 before the 4th respondent seeking mutation of their names in respect of the subject land. It is further case of the petitioners that despite making of application, no action has been initiated. 3 2. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the present Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 4th respondent to consider the application dated 16.12.2024 made by the petitioners and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Dt.16.04.2025 KGR