Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14551 (KAR)

SRI VISHNUKANTH G KATHARE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1687/2025 · 2025-01-23

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2962 WP No. 1687 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO.1687 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI.VISHNUKANTH G KATHARE AGED 62 YEARS (SENIOR CITIZENSHIP BENEFITS NOT CLAIMED) S/O LATE SRI.GANAPATHI N KATHARE & LATE SMT.LAXMI BAI G KATHARE RESIDING AT PID NO.1-56-1, NO.1 12TH KM, TUMKUR ROAD, PEENYA OPPOSITE TO PEENYA TELEPHONE EXCHANGE BENGALURU - 560058 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.KARTHIK N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT D C OFFICE BUILDING Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2962 WP No. 1687 of 2025 K G ROAD BENGALURU - 560009 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB DIVISION 2ND FLOOR KANDAYA BHAVAN DISTRICT OFFICE ROAD AMBEDKAR VEEDHI SAMPANGI RAMA NAGAR BENGALURU - 560009 4. THE TAHASILDHAR BANGALORE NORTH TALUK GROUND FLOOR KANDAYA BHAVAN DISTRICT OFFICE ROAD AMBEDKAR VEEDHI SAMPANGI RAMA NAGAR BENGALURU - 560009 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.B.P.RADHA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-4 TAHSILDAR TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-3 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DATED 25.11.2024 IN RA/BNT- 205/2024 (ANNX-D) BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER DATED 17.12.2024 AND 31.12.2024 HEREIN PRODUCED AT (ANXN-E TO E3) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2962 WP No. 1687 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The petitioner is seeking direction against respondent No.4 – Tahasildar to implement the order dated 25.11.2024 passed by respondent No.3 – Assistant Commissioner and pass appropriate orders on the representations submitted by the petitioner dated 17.12.2024 and 31.12.2024 as per Annexures-E to E.3. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned AGA. 3. The petitioner is tracing title through his mother, who has obtained a registered sale deed on 02.03.1968. Based on this title document, the petitioner is now seeking mutation of his mother’s name in terms of the sale deed. 4. Learned AGA, on instructions, submits that on account of error committed by the Bhoomi Operator, the extents were wrongly reflected, which is now rectified. On instructions, she ensures this Court that the petitioner’s representations will be considered forthwith - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:2962 WP No. 1687 of 2025 and accordingly mutations will be certified aligning with Title Document. 5. Recording her assurance, this Court proceeds to pass the following; ORDER (i) The writ petition is allowed. (ii) Respondent No.4 – Tahasildar shall forthwith implement the order of respondent No.3 – Assistant Commissioner as per Annexure-D and effect change of katha by taking cognizance of the registered sale deed dated 02.03.1968. (iii) This exercise shall be accomplished within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order copy. SD/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40