1 2025:CGHC:36388 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 451 of 2021 1 - Ram Kumar Kaushik, S/o Shri Chhotelal, Aged About 32 Years R/o Village - Limtari, Tahsil - Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhotelal S/o Late Shri Kriparam Aged About 55 Years R/o Village - Limtari, Tahsil - Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Phool Bai Tandon, W/o Kashi Ram Tandon, Aged About 42 Years R/o Hardi, Thana Sirgitti, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through - Station House Officer, Police Station - Sirgitti, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Rajeshwar Yadav, S/o Shri Latelram Yadav, R/o Thana Sirgitti, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.07.29 10:39:10 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. J. K. Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Mr. Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 28.07.2025 1. Heard Mr. J. K. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Soumya Rai, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the respondent/ State. 2. The present CRMP has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :- “It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quash the impugned FIRs and Final report entire criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners pursuant to impugned FIRs bearing crime no.34/2021 for the offences punishable U/s 379, 34 of I.P.C at P.S. Sirgítti, Dist: Bilaspur (CG), in the interest of justice accordingly.” 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties submits that the compromise has been arrived at between the parties as such the petitioner does not want to press this petition, at this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 3 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner/ State after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice S. Bhilwar/ Jyoti