BUKESON BAG v. THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY AND ORS
I.A.(Civil)/1972/2025 · 2025-06-18
Nelson Sailo
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14549 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14549 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010097862022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1972/2025 BUKESON BAG S/O- GUBORDHON BAG, R/O- VILL- UPORLANGTHA, P.O. UPORLANGTHA, PS- BORPATHAR, DIST- GOLAGHAT, (ASSAM). VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETEARY AND 8 ORS.
DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-06.
2:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION KAHILIPARA GHY-19 KAMRUP(M) ASSAM.
3:THE DISTRICT SCRUTINY COMMITTEE JORHAT DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GOLAGHAT DISTRICT.
4:THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER GOLAGHAT DISTRICT.
5:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER EAST BLOCK GOLAGHAT.
6:HEAD MASTER SIMANTA SARUPANI M.E. SCHOOL VILL- RATANPUR
Page No.# 2/3 P.O.- TELISHAL DIST- GOLAGHAT (ASSAM).
7:NAREN CHANDRA MAHTO TUTOR SIMANTA SARUPANI M.E. SCHOOL VILL- RATANPUR P.O.- TELISHAL DIST- GOLAGHAT (ASSAM).
8:BISTU HASDA TUTOR SIMANTA SARUPANI M.E. SCHOOL VILL- RATANPUR P.O.- TELISHAL DIST- GOLAGHAT (ASSAM).
9:NANDESWAR KURMI TUTOR SIMANTA SARUPANI M.E. SCHOOL VILL- RATANPUR P.O.- TELISHAL DIST- GOLAGHAT (ASSAM) Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K DAS, M N KHAN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, MR. J M GOGOI (R-8,9),MR. B D GOSWAMI (R- 8,9),MR. D GOGOI (R-7),MR S BORTHAKUR(R-7),GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
19.06.2025 Heard Mr. B.K. Das, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that by filing this application, the applicant/writ petitioner is seeking impleadment of Mission Director, Sarba Siksha Abhiyan, Axom as party respondent No.10 in the connected writ petition.
Page No.# 3/3 Learned counsel for the applicant submits that impleadment of the said party is required for proper adjudication of the matter. Mr. J.M. Gogoi, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.8 and 9 has no objection to the prayer for impleading the Mission Director, Sarba Siksha Abhiyan, Axom as party respondent No.10 in the connected writ petition. Likewise, Ms. N. Phukan, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education Department and Mr. P.H. Phukan, learned counsel for the respondent No.7 also submit that they have no objection if the application is allowed. In view of the above and upon perusal of the contents of the application, the Mission Director, Sarba Siksha Abhiyan, Axom is allowed to be impleaded as party respondent No.10 in the connected writ petition. Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands allowed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant