Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 145480 (ALL)

MANJOOR ALIAS MANJU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/640/2025 · 2025-06-13

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35473 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 640 of 2025 Applicant :- Manjoor Alias Manju Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arti Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 3. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 112 of 2025 u/s 109, 352 of B.N.S. and Section 3/5A/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 3/25 Arms Act, Police Station- Baldirai, District- Sultanpur. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the confessional statement of co-accused. He is ready to cooperate in the investigation. No custodial interrogation is necessary, therefore, he may be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 5. Mr. Piyush Kumar Singh, learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer of the applicant and submitted that the applicant is having criminal antecedents of six cases. Most of the cases are related to Cow Slaughter Act and his involvement was also found in one case related to U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, therefore, he is not entitled for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and going through the contents of the FIR as well as other relevant documents and supplementary affidavit filed by the counsel for the applicant, the applicant is having criminal antecedents of six cases of identical nature, therefore, applicant is not entitled for anticipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, the application is hereby rejected. Order Date :- 13.6.2025/Reena (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench