Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:35394 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 641 of 2025 Applicant :- Vinay Kumar Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Learned counsel for the applicant is directed to correct the description of respondent no.2, forthwith. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The present bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. No. 129 of 2025, under Sections 3(5), 61(2), 316(4), 338, 336(1), 336(2), 340(2), 351(3) BNS, Police Station Masauli, District Barabanki. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that applicant was working as an accountant in the firm of the private respondent, thereafter, on the advise of the private respondent, applicant consented for a new firm and new firm was created by the private respondent adding name of the applicant. The said firm was also ran by the private respondent and when the liability of G.S.T. was found on the said firm, then applicant made a complaint to the authorities, as a result, private respondent felt annoyed, thereafter, his father lodged an F.I.R. No.147 of 2025 under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 316(2), 3(5), 344, 316(4), 351(3) BNS, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, Barabanki. Thereafter, anticipatory bail was filed before this Court, which was allowed vide order dated 8.5.2025 passed in Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No.409 of 2025, then private respondent also filed an F.IR. of case in question with the same verbatim. He further submits that applicant is ready to cooperate in the investigation, therefore, no custodial interrogation is necessary. In such circumstances, applicant is entitled for protection of this Court under the provisions of anticipatory bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. opposes the prayer of the applicant but he does not dispute this fact that contents of the earlier F.I.R. and present F.I.R. is identical in nature and in the earlier case, applicant has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail. 6. I have considered the argument of the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the complainant and gone through the contents of the F.I.R., bail application and other relevant records. 7. Thus, having regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case, the present anticipatory bail application stands finally disposed of with the direction that till the submission of the police report, if any, under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. before the competent court, in the event of arrest of the applicant- Vinay Kumar Verma, involved in aforesaid F.I.R., he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (1) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation or for discovery of any fact by a police officer/investigating officer as and when required and will cooperate in the investigation. (2) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (3) The applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Court. (4) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the trial court and if he has not been issued any passport, an affidavit in this regard shall be filed by him before the trial court. 8. Any violation of above conditions will be treated misuse of bail and court below will be at liberty to pass appropriate order in the matter. Order Date :- 11.6.2025 GauraV/- Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench